Search

GRIEVANCES on 31.05.2016

Public Grievances

English

1. Grievance Redressal Mechanism in Telecom Services Sector

(a) The primary responsibility of addressing the grievances related to service, billing, quality of service, etc. lies with Telecom Service Providers (TSPs), which emanates from licensing terms and conditions. As per licensing conditions

            “Any dispute, with regard to the provision of SERVICE shall be a matter only between the aggrieved party and the LICENSEE, who shall duly notify this to all before providing the SERVICE and in no case the LICENSOR shall bear any liability or responsibility in the matter.”

 (b) In order to streamline the process of grievance redressal mechanism by the service providers, TRAI has issued “Telecom Complaint Redressal Regulations 2012”. Which is available on TRAI website. According to this, all TSPs should set up a Two Tier grievance redressal mechanism. The highlights of this mechanism are -

      (i)  Establishment of a Complaint Centre: Every service provider shall, establish a Complaint Centre for redressal of complaints and for addressing service requests of its consumers. Complaint Centre is accessible to its consumers through a toll-free “Consumer Care Number”. Every service provider shall also, establish a ‘Web Based Complaint Monitoring System’ to enable the consumers to monitor the status of their complaints. Every Complaint Centre shall, immediately on receipt of a complaint from a consumer, register such complaint and allot a unique number to be called the docket number.

     (ii)   Establishment of an Appellate Authority: Every service provider shall, establish an Appellate Authority in each of its licensed service areas to dispose of the appeals filed. Where a consumer is not satisfied with the redressal of his complaint by the Complaint Centre, or his complaint remains unaddressed or no intimation of redressal of the complaint is received within the period specified, such consumer may prefer an appeal to the Appellate Authority of the concerned service provider for redressal of his complaint.

(c) Accordingly all complainants have to approach to their service providers for redressal of their grievances through “Two Tier Institutionalized Grievances Redressal Mechanism” of the concerned Service Provider established by it under Telecom Consumer Complaint Redressal Regulations, 2012 (1 of 2012) of TRAI issued on 05th January 2012 and amendments thereto.

 

2. Public Grievance Cell in DoT

(a)    However, in case a grievance is not redressed even after exhausting the procedure as prescribed above, an individual complainant without prejudice to his right to approach an appropriate Court of Law, may approach Public Grievance Cell of Department of Telecommunications (DoT), along with all documentary evidence(s) for non-redressal of his grievance at concerned Service Provider level.

(b)  Complainants are advised to use an online platform, Centralised Public Grievance Redress and Monitoring System (CPGRAMS) web portal http://www.pgportal.gov.in for registering their grievance. Any grievance sent by e-mail may not be attended to/entertained

(c)   The status of the grievance filed in CPGRAMS can be tracked with the unique registration ID provided at the time of registration of the complainant. CPGRAMS also provides appeal facility to the citizens if they are not satisfied with the resolution by the Grievance Officer.

(d)   Issues which are not considered as grievances :

  • RTI Matters
  • Court related / Sub-judice matters
  • Religious matters
  • Suggestions
  • Grievances of Government employees concerning their service matters including disciplinary proceedings etc. unless the aggrieved employee has already exhausted the prescribed channels keeping in view the DoPT OM No. 11013/08/2013-Estt.(A-III) dated 31.08.2015.

  (e)  The complaint so registered is forwarded to the concerned service  provider / subordinate organization(s) and / or to the concerned unit in DoT with an advice to take appropriate action in the matter and to inform the complainant regarding the action taken towards the redressal of grievance.

  (f)   The grievance is to be redressed by concerned service provider/ concerned forwarded organizations only. PG Cell of DoT acts only as a facilitator in the redressal process and is not vested with any powers to penalize the service provider for not redressing the grievance to the satisfaction of the complainant or for delay in redressing the grievance.

  (g)  Contact details of Public Grievance Cell in DoT
         Public Grievances wing, Department of Telecom,
         Room No. 603, Mahanagar Doorsanchar Bhawan,
         Old Minto Road, J. L. Nehru Marg, New Delhi 110002
         Phone No 011- 23221166, 1063 (Toll Free)

 

 

Date: 
Friday, September 1, 2023
ADMIN on 19.04.2022

DOTEL/R/E/20/01027/1

To

The Central Public Information Officer (CPIO),
Department of Telecommunication (DOT)
New Delhi 110001

1.FULL NAME OF THE APPLICANT: Amit Sharma S/o Shri Kewal Krishan Sharma

2.ADDRESS OF THE APPLICANT: BLOCK: C-4-D, FLAT No. 12-C, Janak Puri, New Delhi 110058

3.EMAIL ADDRESS, IF ANY: amitysharma[at]gmail[dot]com

4.TELEPHONE NO. AND/OR MOBILE NO.: 9871244722

5.DETAILS OF INFORMATION SOUGHT:

I, Amit Sharma S/o Shri Kewal Krishan Sharma, i.e. RTI Applicant herein earnestly requesting the Honble CPIO DOT to kindly facilitate him (the applicant) on this RTI Application by providing information pointwise. Also, the RTI Applicant would like to request the Honble CPIO to please supply information in necessary coordination and consultation with concerned departments under Section 6(3) of RTI and as per the DOT Guidelines, Standards, Instructions, and Procedures on the documents and records.

REQUESTING YOUR HONOR TO KINDLY BE GRACIOUS ENOUGH TO PROVIDE INFORMATION POINT WISE AS SOUGHT BY THE RTI APPLICANT:

a. Please provide details of Telecom service provider customer rights as per DOT Procedure, Guidelines and Standards while seeking he / she is seeking his/her own call data records (CDRs) including tower location details.

b. Please provide DOT process according to which a Telecom service provider customer can seek his / her own call data records (CDRs) details including tower location details.

c. In case the individual (customer) of a telecom service provider being refused by Service Provider / DOT / TRAI / Law Enforcement Agency to get his/her own call data records (CDRs) then will it not be a violation of consumer rights, fundamental rights as well as human rights. Please provide answer in reference to the documented procedure if any available otherwise, please specify that there is no such procedure available with concerned department on consumer rights.

d. Please specify the process that indicate DOT concerned with individual (customer) on their CDRs storage and its management to protect customer rights to get information on CDR as per DOT Guidelines, Standards, Instructions, and Procedures.

6.DOES the INFORMATION SOUGHT FALL UNDER SECTION 8: Information sought by the RTI Applicant does not fall within the exemptions contained in Section 8 of the Right to Information Act, 2005 and to the best of his knowledge it pertains to the concerned CPIO office.

7.DETAILS OF FEE DEPOSITED: Online Fee of Rs. 10 (Ten) paid.

8.DOES THE APPLICANT BELONG TO BPL CATEGORY: YES/NO: No

9.WHETHER THE INFORMATION IS REQUIRED TO BE PROVIDED BY POST OR IN PERSON: Speed Post

10.KINDLY REPLY IN ENGLISH AS DEFINED IN SECTION 6 (1) OF RTI ACT 2005.

I AM A CITIZEN OF INDIA AND ENTITLED TO GET THIS INFORMATION AS A RTI APPLICANT AND CITIZEN OF INDIA.

PLACE: New Delhi Amit Sharma

English
SL Number: 
58
Category: 
0
Request Received Date: 
Thursday, October 1, 2020
Request Reply: 
The information in respect of the RTI Application pertaining to this CPIO is as follows : (i) In respect of Call Details Record, it is intimated that as per Licensing Condition No.39.20 of the Licence Agreement for Unified License, all the Telecom Service Providers have to preserve the CDRs at least for one year for scrutiny by the licenser for security reasons. Licence Agreement of Unified License can be downloaded from the DoT Website from the following URL: http://dot.gov.in/sites/default/files/Unified%20Licence_0.pdf The License condition do not madate Telecom Service Providers(TSPs) to provide CDRs to the general public. CDRs are provided by the TSPs to the Law Enforcement Agencies & to various Courts upon their requests/directions. (ii) In respect of the itemised billing needs of the subscribers, Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI), in its Telecom Consumers Protection Regulations, 2012 has mandated Telecom Service Provider (TSPs) to provide itemized billing of all chargeable calls/SMS/VAS, etc., on demand/request of the subscriber for his own number after taking applicable charges as per TRAI orders. The itemized billing is to be stored by the TSP for at least 6 months and is to be provided within 1 month after receipt of request from subscriber.
Apeal Received Date: 
Sunday, November 22, 2020
Appeal: 
To The First Appellate Authority, DOT, New Delhi - 110001 1.Name of the Appellant:Amit Sharma S/o Shri Kewal Krishan Sharma 2.Address of the Applicant/Appellant:C-4-D / 12-C, Janak Puri, New Delhi - 110058 Mobile:9871244722 e-Mail:amitysharma[at]gmail[dot]com 3.Particulars of the Central Public Information Officer: (a)Name(s) of the CPIO:Shri. ROBIN ADAVAL, Dir(AS-II) (b)Address:Government of India, DOT, Access Services-II, Sanchar Bhawan, 20, Ashoka Road, New Delhi - 110001 Address as above has been specified in the reply of the RTI Ref. No. DOTEL/R/E/20/01027/1 dated 1st Oct 2020 (as annexed) which was later transferred viz. Ref. No. DOTEL/R/T/20/00983 dated 9th Oct 2020 (as annexed) and finally both the aforesaid RTI Application references could be observed as disposed-off on 14th Oct 2020 at online RTI portal without providing appropriate information. No address or contact details of CPIO specified at online RTI Portal. Response (as annexed in this First Appeal) has been received by the RTI Applicant i.e. First Appeal Applicant on 7th Nov 2020 via Speed Post at around 16:00 HRS IST. 4.Date of submission of application for seeking information:DOTEL/R/E/20/01027/1 dated 1st Oct 2020 5.Date on which 30 days from submission of application are over: Response received on 7th Nov2020 via Speed Post at around 16:00 HRS IST. This First Appeal has been filed on 22nd Nov 2020 well within the defined timelines after receiving response dated 26th Oct 2020 via Postal consignment tracking No. ED397360047IN on 7th Nov 2020 at around 16:00 HRS IST (as annexed). There is no relation of responses provided by the said CPIO to the information sought by the RTI Applicant in his aforementioned RTI Application hence due to vague and incomplete said response provided by CPIO RTI Applicant is aggrieved and disappointed hence this First Appeal. 6.Reasons for Appeal:Details as attached in this First Appeal 7.Date for filing the appeal :22nd Nov 2020 8.Particulars of Information (a)Information requested:Information sought on the following points of RTI for which the reason / ground for Appeal has been specified for each point as above. Appropriate response on Point (a) to (d) of said RTI as well as Response on First Appeal under RTI Act 2005. (b)Subject:RTI related to DOT (c)Period:From 15th Oct 2017 to the date of providing response to this First Appeal. 9.No fee applicable for the First Appeal. RTI fee has already been paid by the Applicant. 10.Whether the information is required to be provided by post or in person:SPEED POST. In case by post (Ordinary, Registered or Speed):SPEED POST 11.Kindly reply in ENGLISH as defined in the RTI Act 2005 12.I state that the information sought does not fall within the exemptions contained in the section 8 of the RTI Act 2005 and to the best of my knowledge it pertains to your office. I am a Citizen of India and entitled to get this information as Appellant and Citizen of India. Place:New DelhiAmit Sharma Date:22nd Nov 2020
Apeal Reply: 

The information provided by the CPIO in respect of the above RTI application on 14.10.2020(online reply) and 04.11.2020(by speed post) as follows: "The information in respect of the RTI Application pertaining to this CPIO is as follows : (i) In respect of Call Details Record, it is intimated that as per Licensing Condition No.39.20 of the Licence Agreement for Unified License, all the Telecom Service Providers have to preserve the CDRs at least for one year for scrutiny by the licenser for security reasons. Licence Agreement of Unified License can be downloaded from the DoT Website from the following URL: Download The file ( bytes) pdf Icon The License condition do not madate Telecom Service Providers(TSPs) to provide CDRs to the general public. CDRs are provided by the TSPs to the Law Enforcement Agencies & to various Courts upon their requests/directions. (ii) In respect of the itemised billing needs of the subscribers, Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI), in its Telecom Consumers Protection Regulations, 2012 has mandated Telecom Service Provider (TSPs) to provide itemized billing of all chargeable calls/SMS/VAS, etc., on demand/request of the subscriber for his own number after taking applicable charges as per TRAI orders. The itemized billing is to be stored by the TSP for at least 6 months and is to be provided within 1 month after receipt of request from subscriber."

A suitable reply has been provided by the CPIO.

Apeal Reg No: 
DOTEL/A/E/20/00237
ADMIN on 19.04.2022

DOTEL/R/T/20/00297

Provide the information under RTI Act, 2005:

I had one Airtel prepaid sim card. Due to the mobile issue, I have not used my sim card for 2 months but after 2 months when I tried to use my sim card again. It showing that the sim card is invalid. I asked the customer care they said that they had allotted my sim card to another customer. I lodge a complaint on 08/01/2019 on NCH (National Consumer Helpline Portal) and grievance number is 1092008 and In response of my complaint, Airtel responded that it is their Terms & Condition.

But my concern is how the company allotted one customer number to another customer without informing the customer. At the time of sim purchasing dealer or company not informed me regarding the terms and conditions. They should need to inform the same to the customer. Company should

Another thing is the customer adds his phone number in his bank account and sometimes he creates many e-wallet accounts with the same number and even I have created my Paytm account with the same number and I have done KYC with my aadhar card. And with one aadhar card, no e-wallet allows you to do KYC twice. So why Airtel allotted my number to another customer. In this case, a person can misuse the number of other customers. Please give me clarification on this.

I am also attaching the supporting documents for the same. And please revert back on this as soon as possible.

English
SL Number: 
49
Category: 
9
Request Received Date: 
Wednesday, April 1, 2020
Request Reply: 
At the outset, it is to mention that the information sought by you under Right to Information Act, 2005 pertains to creating information by drawing inference and or making of assumptions or interpreting information for furnishing replies to hypothetical questions viz. Why etc which do not fall under the definition of Information under section 2 f of the RTI Act, 2005. Further, in terms of para 10 of the Guide on Right to Information Act, 2005 issued by Department of Personnel and Training, Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances & Pension vide OM No.1.32.2013 IR dated 28th November, 2013, the CPIO is neither supposed to create information that is not a part of the record of the public authority nor required to furnish information which require drawing of inference and or making of assumptions or to interpret information. However, in respect of the subject matter of your querries, it is intimated that instructions of DoT i.r.o.Reallocation of deactivated disconnected Cellular Mobile Telephone connection of a subscriber were issued vide letters dated 13.4.2017 and 20.4.2017 and can be downloaded from the DoT website.
Appeal: 
Apeal Reply: 
Apeal Reg No: 
0